Economics at your fingertips  

Heterogeneity in Preferences for Anti-coagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: A Latent Class Analysis

Janine Til (), Catharina Oudshoorn-Groothuis, Marieke Weernink and Clemens Birgelen
Additional contact information
Janine Til: University of Twente
Catharina Oudshoorn-Groothuis: University of Twente
Marieke Weernink: University of Twente
Clemens Birgelen: University of Twente

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2020, vol. 13, issue 4, No 6, 445-455

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Recent reviews on patients’ preferences towards attributes of oral anti-coagulant therapy have shown that preference for convenience of therapy is heterogeneous. In this study, we used a novel approach—latent class analysis (LCA)—to assess heterogeneity. Methods We developed a health preference survey that consisted of 12 discrete choice questions. The following attributes of convenience were included: intake frequency; need for regular coagulation monitoring; diet or drug interactions; relation between medication and food intake; and pill type. Background questions about gender, age, current therapy [i.e., direct-acting oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], self-reported medication adherence, and pill burden were included. Mixed logit analysis (MLA) and LCA were performed. The scale-adjusted LCA model with two scale classes and four preference classes emerged as the model with the best fit and interpretability. Results A total of 508 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from five European countries (Germany, Italy, Spain, France, and the UK) were surveyed in August 2017. The most important attributes were need for monitoring (37%) and intake frequency (27%). Patient preferences were significantly influenced by country, gender, and current anti-coagulant therapy. Four different preference classes of patients were identified in the LCA. First, most patients (57%) were in the “no need for regular coagulation monitoring” class. Current DOAC users and patients who were the least adherent to therapy were more likely to prefer no coagulation monitoring. Second, 20% of patients were in the “balanced” class of patients. Current VKA users with moderate adherence were more likely to be in this class. Patients who reported the lowest adherence were most likely in the “once daily, interactions likely” class (16%). Fourth, current VKA users and highly adherent patients were most likely to prefer therapies with a need for regular coagulation monitoring (7%). Conclusions This study demonstrated significant preference heterogeneity among patients with atrial fibrillation and linked these preferences to differences in background characteristics. Country of residence and currently prescribed therapy influenced patient preferences in both the MLA and LCA models.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00420-z

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

Page updated 2020-08-29
Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00420-z