Patient Perspectives of Quality of the Same-Day Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation Process in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Qualitative Dominant Mixed-Methods Analysis of the SLATE II Trial

Nancy A. Scott (), Mhairi Maskew (), Rachel M. Fong (), Ingrid E. Olson (), Alana T. Brennan (), Matthew P. Fox (), Lungisile Vezi (), Peter D. Ehrenkranz () and Sydney Rosen ()
Additional contact information
Nancy A. Scott: Boston University School of Public Health
Mhairi Maskew: University of the Witwatersrand
Rachel M. Fong: Boston University School of Public Health
Ingrid E. Olson: Boston University School of Public Health
Alana T. Brennan: Boston University School of Public Health
Matthew P. Fox: Boston University School of Public Health
Lungisile Vezi: University of the Witwatersrand
Peter D. Ehrenkranz: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Sydney Rosen: Boston University School of Public Health

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, vol. 14, issue 2, No 2, 175-186

Abstract: Abstract Background HIV patients in South Africa continue to report operational barriers to starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). In the Simplified Algorithm for Treatment Eligibility (SLATE) II trial, same-day initiation (SDI) of ART increased the number of patients commencing ART and achieving HIV viral suppression by using a screening tool to distinguish between patients eligible for SDI and those requiring additional care before starting treatment. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to explore trial patients’ perceptions and experiences of SDI. Methods SLATE II was implemented at three urban, public primary health care clinics in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We conducted a short quantitative survey and in-depth interviews among a purposive sample of 89 of the 593 trial participants in the intervention and standard arms, using a mixed inductive–deductive framework approach. Results Nearly all respondents (95%) were satisfied with their care, despite reporting clinic wait times of ≥ 3 h (72%). Intervention patients found the initiation process to be easy; standard patients found it complicated and were frustrated with being shuffled around the clinic. No intervention arm patients felt that SDI was “too fast” or indicated a preference for a more gradual process. Both groups highlighted the need for good counselling and non-judgmental, respectful staff. Standard patients suggested improving patient–provider relations, strengthening counselling, reducing wait times, and minimising referrals. Conclusions While it is difficult to untangle the role of providers from that of the SLATE algorithm in influencing patient experiences, adoption of SLATE II implementation procedures could improve patient experience of treatment initiation. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03315013, registered October 19, 2017.

Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00437-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00437-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00437-4

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().