Constructing Health State Descriptions for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Stakeholder Engagement and Formative Qualitative Research

Erin G. Roth (), Justin Kim, Julia F. Slejko, C. Daniel Mullins, Jennifer L. Doyle, David L. Levitt, Miguel Melendez, Kyle J. Fletke and Yinin Hu
Additional contact information
Erin G. Roth: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
Justin Kim: University of Maryland Baltimore
Julia F. Slejko: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
C. Daniel Mullins: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
Jennifer L. Doyle: University of Maryland Thyroid Cancer Community Advisory Board
David L. Levitt: University of Maryland Thyroid Cancer Community Advisory Board
Miguel Melendez: University of Maryland Thyroid Cancer Community Advisory Board
Kyle J. Fletke: University of Maryland School of Medicine
Yinin Hu: University of Maryland Baltimore

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, vol. 16, issue 1, No 8, 67-76

Abstract: Abstract Overview This paper describes stakeholder involvement and formative qualitative research in the creation of health state descriptions (HSDs) or vignettes for low-risk thyroid cancer. The aim of this project was to engage stakeholders in the contribution of a novel set of HSDs, an important first step in the process of assessing value in thyroid cancer health states. Methods We draw upon formative, descriptive qualitative methods, following a multi-stage framework of data collection. We conducted individual semi-structured interviews, cognitive interviews, and focus groups with thyroid cancer patients, community providers, academic subspecialists, and participants with no thyroid cancer diagnosis (N = 31). The HSDs went through several iterations over the course of a year, in collaboration with a highly engaged community advisory board, laying the groundwork for HSDs that are comprehensible, comparable, and appropriate for stated-preference research. Findings Thyroid cancer survivors compared their experiences with those described in the HSDs. Feedback included concern for the emotional well-being of study participants who would be reading them. Providers were attuned to the need for clinical accuracy and made suggestions to reflect their clinical experience, including for patients with complications or disease progression. The pilot participants with no thyroid cancer were particularly valuable in promoting the need to simplify language and maximize readability. Discussion Stakeholder engagement was critical to being responsive to feedback as the iterations were refined and presented. Continuous engagement and consultation with multiple sources strengthened the HSDs. A secondary outcome from this project is that stakeholders expressed interest in adapting the HSDs into decision aids for people newly diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer.

Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00597-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00597-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00597-5

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().