Routine Quality-of-Life Measurement in Residential Aged Care: Staff, Resident, and Family Perspectives

Andrew Simon Gilbert (), Frances Batchelor (), Nancy Devlin (), Briony Dow (), Brendan Mulhern (), Rosalie Viney (), Tessa Peasgood () and Lidia Engel ()
Additional contact information
Andrew Simon Gilbert: National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Frances Batchelor: National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Nancy Devlin: University of Melbourne
Briony Dow: National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Brendan Mulhern: University of Technology Sydney
Rosalie Viney: University of Technology Sydney
Tessa Peasgood: University of Melbourne
Lidia Engel: National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2025, vol. 18, issue 3, No 3, 223 pages

Abstract: Abstract Background and objectives There is interest in routinely measuring quality of life (QoL) in aged care homes, evidenced by the Australian Government’s implementation of QoL as a mandatory quality indicator. This study explores views of aged care staff, residents, and family members on the benefits, challenges, and feasibility of implementing routine QoL measures. Methods Qualitative data were gathered to explore staff, resident, and family perspectives on QoL measurement in aged care homes, including purpose, benefits, implementation, and best practice. Two staff workshops were conducted at different aged care homes, and semi-structured interviews were held with 29 proxies (9 family members and 20 staff) and 24 residents. Workshops and interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed via a qualitative interpretive approach using NVivo software. Results Analysis yielded four key themes: (1) benefits of routine QoL measurement; (2) challenges in implementation; (3) best practice for collecting surveys; (4) validity concerns. Identified benefits included potentially improved care, monitoring service performance, and informing family members. Staff participants recommended integrating measures into existing care planning and having oversight from a registered nurse. Participants identified potential implementation challenges, including administrative burden, time and resourcing constraints, conflicts of interest, and resistance from staff, providers, and residents. Conclusions This study identifies potential benefits to implementing routine QoL measurement in residential aged care homes. To maximise these benefits, it is important to consider how measurement can be integrated in ways that contribute to existing care planning and practices.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00729-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00729-7

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().