 Preferences of Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer for Treatment with Oral or Intravenous ChemotherapyCandida Mastroianni (), Caterina Viscomi, Silvia Ceniti, Rosanna Simone, Aldo Filice, Gennaro Caldarola, Stefania Infusino, Caterina Manfredi, Antonio Rea, Claudia Sandomenico, Salvatore Turano, Francesco Serranò, Giovanni Condemi, Carla Cortese, Tullia Prantera and Salvatore Palazzo The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2008, vol. 1, issue 3, 187 pages Abstract: Background: In recent years, patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life have become important areas of clinician focus in general cancer management. Patients’ preferences for, and/or satisfaction with, oral versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy schedules may have a major impact on such outcomes. Objective: To evaluate preferences for oral or IV chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 12 hospitals in Southern Italy, in which 22 patients with advanced colorectal cancer received one cycle of oral capecitabine ± irinotecan or oxaliplatin, followed by one cycle of an IV de Gramont or similar regimen (arm A), or the same regimens in reverse order (arm B). Patients were aged 50–70 years and 21% had a higher level of education (graduate or similar). Patients received oral capecitabine 3500 mg/m 2 /day for 7 days (± irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 on ay 1 only), followed by an IV de Gramont regimen ± irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin (FOLFOX); or the two schedules administered in reverse order. The main outcome measure was patients’ preferences for oral versus IV chemotherapy, as determined by a pre- and post-treatment therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). Results: Before treatment, 75% of patients preferred oral therapy. Characteristics that patients considered to be important were that treatment should not interfere with daily activities (100% of patients) and should not cause fatigue (95%), diarrhea (76%), or painful mouth ulcers (76%); other factors considered important were the risk of infection and nausea (90%), and that treatment could be administered at home (65%). After receiving both chemotherapy schedules, only 45% of patients preferred oral therapy, while 55% preferred IV therapy. Among the latter, the most important characteristics influencing treatment choice were less nausea (66%), fewer mood effects (65%), the safety of hospital IV treatment (62%), less interference with family relationships (55%), less vomiting (55%), less interference with daily activities (50%), and less diarrhea (50%). Although the order in which patients received therapy did not influence treatment preference, significantly fewer patients with a lower rather than higher educational level preferred oral therapy (47% vs 80%; chi-square test=9.9; p=0.002). Conclusion: These results suggest that there may be a correlation between educational level and the preference of patients with advanced colorectal cancer for oral or IV chemotherapy. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2008 Date: 2008 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:1:y:2008:i:3:p:181-187 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00005 Access Statistics for this article The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.