Test–Retest Reliability of an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30

J. Lundy (), Stephen Coons and Neil Aaronson

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2015, vol. 8, issue 2, 165-170

Abstract: The measurement equivalence of the IVR and paper versions of the QLQ-C30 has been reported elsewhere. This analysis provides evidence demonstrating adequate test–retest reliability of the IVR version for 11 of the QLQ-C30’s 15 scores. Copyright Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40271-014-0071-2 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:165-170

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0071-2

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().