EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cost-Utility Analysis of a Dolutegravir-Based Versus Low-Dose Efavirenz-Based Regimen for the Initial Treatment of HIV-Infected Patients in Cameroon (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Trial)

Marwân-al-Qays Bousmah (), Marie Libérée Nishimwe, Tamara Tovar-Sanchez, Martial Lantche Wandji, Mireille Mpoudi-Etame, Gwenaëlle Maradan, Pierrette Omgba Bassega, Marie Varloteaux, Alice Montoyo, Charles Kouanfack, Eric Delaporte and Sylvie Boyer ()
Additional contact information
Marie Libérée Nishimwe: Aix-Marseille University
Tamara Tovar-Sanchez: Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD)-INSERM, and University Hospital of Montpellier
Martial Lantche Wandji: Central Hospital of Yaoundé
Mireille Mpoudi-Etame: Military Hospital
Gwenaëlle Maradan: ORS PACA, Observatoire Régional de la Santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
Pierrette Omgba Bassega: Cité Verte Hospital
Marie Varloteaux: Central Hospital of Yaoundé
Alice Montoyo: ANRS
Charles Kouanfack: Central Hospital of Yaoundé
Eric Delaporte: Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD)-INSERM, and University Hospital of Montpellier
Sylvie Boyer: Aix-Marseille University

PharmacoEconomics, 2021, vol. 39, issue 3, No 5, 343 pages

Abstract: Abstract Objectives Evidence comparing the economic and patient values of the World Health Organization’s preferred (dolutegravir 50 mg [DTG]-based) and alternative (low-dose [400 mg] efavirenz [EFV400]-based) first-line antiretroviral regimens is limited. We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs), costs, and the cost-utility of DTG- versus EFV400-based regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1 adults in the randomised NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Methods We used clinical data, PROs, and health resource use data collected in the trial’s first 96 weeks (2016–2019). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were computed using utility scores obtained from the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) generic health scale. Other PROs included perceived symptoms, depression, anxiety, and stress. In the 96-week base-case analysis, we estimated the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted (1) mean costs (in US$, 2016 values) and QALYs/patient, (2) incremental costs and QALYs/patient, and (3) net health benefit (NHB). Outcomes were extrapolated over 5 and 10 years. Uncertainty was assessed using the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and scenario and cost-effective price threshold analyses. Results In the base-case analysis, the NHB (95% confidence interval) for the DTG-based regimen relative to the EFV400-based regimen was 0.056 (− 0.037 to 0.153), corresponding to an 88% probability of DTG being cost-effective. A 10% decrease in this regimen’s price (from $5.2 to $4.7/month) would increase its cost-effectiveness probability to 95%. When extrapolating outcomes over 5 and 10 years, the DTG-based regimen had a 100% probability of being cost-effective for a large range of cost-effectiveness thresholds. Conclusions At 2020 antiretroviral drug prices, a DTG-based first-line regimen should be preferred over an EFV400-based regimen in sub-Saharan Africa. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02777229.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-020-00987-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Cost-Utility Analysis of a Dolutegravir-Based Versus Low-Dose Efavirenz-Based Regimen for the Initial Treatment of HIV-Infected Patients in Cameroon (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Trial) (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00987-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273

DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00987-3

Access Statistics for this article

PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-08
Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00987-3