How do farmers choose the professionals with whom they work to ensure herd health management? An approach based on the diversity of prescription systems in dairy cattle farming

Eulalie Ramat (), Lucie Gouttenoire and Nathalie Girard
Additional contact information
Eulalie Ramat: Université Clermont Auvergne, AgroParisTech, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, Territoires
Lucie Gouttenoire: Université Clermont Auvergne, AgroParisTech, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, Territoires
Nathalie Girard: Université Toulouse, INRAE, UMR1248 Agir

Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 2023, vol. 104, issue 2, No 5, 217-242

Abstract: Abstract Encouraged to design a more agroecological livestock system, farmers today must develop new practices to address herd health management. They must do this on their farms, alongside other farmers, but also with the support of various livestock professionals, such as veterinarians and agricultural advisers, each with their own skills and knowledge. This article analyses how these farmers enlist the aid of different professionals in their quest for a more agroecological approach to herd health management. Drawing on a conceptual framework, based on the prescription relationship concept, we refer to all the professionals involved as a “prescription system”. The qualitative analysis of the 26 interviews conducted with French dairy farmers involved in an agroecological approach reveals five types of prescription systems: (i) one structured around the farm work collective and a few trusted prescribers; (ii) one organised around farmers seeking prescribers and concrete solutions; (iii) one extended around an autonomous operator; (iv) one oriented towards prescribers capable of promoting transition by encouraging discussions around health; (v) one designed to promote precise and technical herd health management. The question, then, is how do these different systems provide farmers with learning opportunities in their quest for agroecological approaches to health management? The extent to which these systems influence farmers’ representations of health management, and the manner in which the latter’s perceptions of health help to shape these systems, therefore appears to be worth exploring.

Keywords: Farming; Health management; Agroecology; Prescription; Network; Support; Veterinarians (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41130-023-00193-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:roafes:v:104:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s41130-023-00193-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... nomics/journal/41130

DOI: 10.1007/s41130-023-00193-7

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies is currently edited by Stephan Marette and Ronan Le Velly

More articles in Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().