Board gender diversity and cash holding: the effect of family ties
Gema del C. Fleitas-Castillo (),
Jerónimo Pérez-Alemán () and
Domingo Javier Santana-Martín ()
Additional contact information
Gema del C. Fleitas-Castillo: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Jerónimo Pérez-Alemán: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Domingo Javier Santana-Martín: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Review of Managerial Science, 2025, vol. 19, issue 4, No 6, 1193 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Using a sample of 630 firm-year observations of non-financial Spanish listed companies for the period 2004–2020, this study examines linkages of family and non-family female directors and cash holding. We show that family and non-family female directors affect cash holdings differently. When the presence of family female directors is scarce, their role is eclipsed, thereby encouraging actions related to family goals and increasing cash holdings. However, when the presence of family female directors reaches a critical mass, the cohesion between the interests of the dominant family and external investors increases, thereby reducing the level of cash holdings. When the number of non-family female directors is low, the cash level of family firms is reduced, suggesting that non-family female directors encourage the family firm’s cash reduction as a result of their greater capacity to control and their orientation towards an effective corporate governance system. This cash-decreasing effect will occur even if the number of non-family female directors is low, since the purpose of appointing non-family female directors is less likely to be symbolic. In addition, non-family female directors are concerned about threats to reputational capital, such that reducing cash holdings would promote their reputation as credible supervisors, protect their current appointments, and also boost the likelihood of future appointments. However, the presence of a critical mass of non-family female directors becomes a sufficiently powerful instrument of control and legitimation for external investors, allowing for increased cash levels without increasing agency conflicts.
Keywords: Gender; Cash holding; Board of directors; Family ties (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G32 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-024-00788-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00788-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/business/journal/11846
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-024-00788-4
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Managerial Science is currently edited by R. Ewert and W. Kürsten
More articles in Review of Managerial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().