Do Research Training Groups Operate at Optimal Size?
Birgit Pferdmenges and
Additional contact information
Birgit Pferdmenges: University of Tuebingen
Schmalenbach Business Review, 2017, vol. 18, issue 2, 129-145
Abstract In this paper, we analyze whether structured PhD programs operate at optimal size and whether there are differences between different disciplinary fields. Theoretically, we postulate that the relation between the size of a PhD program and program performance is hump shaped. For our empirical analysis, we use hand-collected data on 86 Research Training Groups (RTGs) funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). As performance indicators, we use (a) the number of completed PhDs and (b) the number of publications by RTG students (PhD students and postdoctoral researchers). Applying DEA with constant and variable returns to scale, we find that the optimal team size varies between 10 and 16 RTG students in the humanities and social sciences. In contrast, our empirical analysis does not uncover a systematic relation between size and performance for RTGs in the natural and life sciences.
Keywords: I23; I21; I28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41464-017-0029-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:schmbr:v:18:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s41464-017-0029-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Schmalenbach Business Review is currently edited by Alfred Wagenhofer
More articles in Schmalenbach Business Review from Springer, Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().