Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Lutz Bornmann () and
Additional contact information
Hans-Dieter Daniel: University of Zurich, Evaluation Office
Scientometrics, 2005, vol. 65, issue 3, 391-392
Summary Hirsch (2005) has proposed the h-index as a single-number criterion to evaluate the scientific output of a researcher (Ball, 2005): A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Np − h) papers have fewer than h citations each. In a study on committee peer review (Bornmann & Daniel, 2005) we found that on average the h-index for successful applicants for post-doctoral research fellowships was consistently higher than for non-successful applicants.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (40) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:65:y:2005:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0281-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel
More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().