Details about Lutz Bornmann

Access statistics for papers by Lutz Bornmann.

Last updated 2020-05-30. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pbo856

Working Papers

2021

1. Is culture related to strong science? An empirical investigation
   Papers, arXiv.org View citations (4)

2020

2. Efficiency of Universities and Research-Focused Institutions Worldwide: An Empirical DEA Investigation Based on Institutional Publication Numbers and Estimated Academic Staff Numbers
   CESifo Working Paper Series, CESifo View citations (2)

2019

3. Alphabetized co-authorship in economics reconsidered
   MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (1)

2018

4. How efficiently produce elite US universities highly cited papers? A case study based on input and output data
   ifo Working Paper Series, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich View citations (2)
5. How to Measure Research Efficiency in Higher Education? Research Grants vs. Publication Output
   CESifo Working Paper Series, CESifo View citations (9)
6. The Graduation Shift of German Universities of Applied Sciences
   ifo Working Paper Series, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich
   Also in MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany (2017)
   See also Journal Article The graduation shift of German universities of applied sciences, PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (2019) (2019)
7. Wie effizient forschen Universitäten in Deutschland, deren Zukunftskonzepte im Rahmen der Exzellenzinitiative ausgezeichnet wurden?
   ifo Working Paper Series, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich View citations (5)

2017

8. Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?
   MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (4)
   See also Journal Article Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?, Scientometrics, Springer (2017) View citations (3) (2017)
9. Normalization of Citation Impact in Economics
   CESifo Working Paper Series, CESifo View citations (8)
   Also in MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany (2017) View citations (8)
   See also Journal Article Normalisation of citation impact in economics, Scientometrics, Springer (2019) View citations (21) (2019)
10. What are the Top Five Journals in Economics? A New Meta–ranking
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (18)
    See also Journal Article What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking, Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals (2018) View citations (28) (2018)
11. Wie effizient sind Universitäten in Deutschland, deren Zukunftskonzepte im Rahmen der Exzellenzinitiative ausgezeichnet wurden? Ein empirischer Vergleich von Input- und Output-Daten zur Forschung
    (How efficient are universities in Germany, which were funded for their “future concepts” in the Excellence Initiative? An empirical comparison of input- and output-data on research)
    MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations (1)

Journal Articles

2020

1. Bibliometrics-based decision tree (BBDT) for deciding whether two universities in the Leiden ranking differ substantially in their performance
   Scientometrics, 2020, 122, (2), 1255-1258
2. Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper
   Scientometrics, 2020, 122, (2), 1051-1074 View citations (8)
3. Correction to: Normalisation of citation impact in economics
   Scientometrics, 2020, 123, (2), 1167-1167
4. Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019)
   Scientometrics, 2020, 123, (2), 1149-1155 View citations (14)
5. Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan’s research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer
   Scientometrics, 2020, 123, (3), 1193-1200 View citations (1)
6. Thomas theorem in research evaluation
   Scientometrics, 2020, 123, (1), 553-555 View citations (3)
7. “Interdisciplinarity” and “Synergy” in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan
   Scientometrics, 2020, 123, (3), 1247-1260 View citations (1)

2019

8. Die Normierung von Zitaten in der Volkswirtschaftslehre
   ifo Schnelldienst, 2019, 72, (20), 29-33
9. Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics
   Scientometrics, 2019, 120, (1), 331-336 View citations (17)
10. Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF)
    Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13, (1), 325-340 View citations (30)
11. Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data
    Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13, (4) View citations (20)
12. Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents – such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach
    Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13, (1), 170-184 View citations (5)
13. Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags
    Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13, (2), 695-707 View citations (20)
14. Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation
    Scientometrics, 2019, 120, (2), 419-459 View citations (11)
15. How Efficiently Do Elite US Universities Produce Highly Cited Papers?
    Publications, 2019, 7, (1), 1-15 View citations (6)
16. How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators
    Scientometrics, 2019, 119, (2), 1187-1205 View citations (3)
17. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient
    Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13, (1), 255-269 View citations (50)
18. Normalisation of citation impact in economics
    Scientometrics, 2019, 120, (2), 841-884 View citations (21)
    See also Working Paper Normalization of Citation Impact in Economics, CESifo Working Paper Series (2017) View citations (8) (2017)
19. Productivity does not equal usefulness
    Scientometrics, 2019, 118, (2), 705-707 View citations (3)
20. R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science)
    Scientometrics, 2019, 120, (2), 925-927 View citations (1)
21. Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2019, 70, (5), 509-525 View citations (3)
22. The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2019, 70, (2), 198-201 View citations (19)
23. The graduation shift of German universities of applied sciences
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14, (1), 1-19
    See also Working Paper The Graduation Shift of German Universities of Applied Sciences, ifo Working Paper Series (2018) (2018)
24. The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor
    Scientometrics, 2019, 119, (3), 1669-1694 View citations (8)
25. The value and credits of n-authors publications
    Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13, (2), 540-554 View citations (7)
26. What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018
    Scientometrics, 2019, 121, (3), 1635-1684 View citations (42)
27. Zur Effizienz deutscher Universitäten und deren Entwicklung zwischen 2004 und 2015
    ifo Schnelldienst, 2019, 72, (21), 15-21
28. hα: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo
    Scientometrics, 2019, 118, (3), 1163-1166 View citations (3)

2018

29. Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting
    Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (2), 436-447 View citations (8)
30. Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention
    Scientometrics, 2018, 115, (2), 1097-1100 View citations (4)
31. Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield
    Scientometrics, 2018, 114, (2), 567-592 View citations (30)
32. Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature
    Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (1), 203-216 View citations (47)
33. Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
    Scientometrics, 2018, 115, (2), 1119-1123 View citations (19)
34. Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?
    Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (3), 906-930 View citations (27)
35. Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics
    Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (3), 598-604 View citations (15)
36. Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change
    Scientometrics, 2018, 116, (1), 623-644 View citations (4)
37. Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13, (5), 1-12 View citations (27)
38. Field classification of publications in Dimensions: a first case study testing its reliability and validity
    Scientometrics, 2018, 117, (1), 637-640 View citations (7)
39. Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data
    Scientometrics, 2018, 116, (2), 997-1012 View citations (6)
40. Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer
    Scientometrics, 2018, 116, (1), 591-608 View citations (15)
41. Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores
    Scientometrics, 2018, 116, (2), 655-674 View citations (4)
42. Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data
    Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (3), 998-1011 View citations (6)
43. Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph
    Scientometrics, 2018, 115, (1), 385-394 View citations (4)
44. Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) with publications in the area of academic efficiency studies: what are the historical roots of this research topic?
    Applied Economics, 2018, 50, (13), 1442-1453 View citations (5)
45. Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield’s publications
    Scientometrics, 2018, 114, (2), 439-448 View citations (5)
46. The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK
    Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12, (3), 931-949 View citations (7)
47. The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science
    Scientometrics, 2018, 114, (1), 367-370 View citations (2)
48. Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis
    Scientometrics, 2018, 114, (2), 427-437 View citations (20)
49. What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking
    Applied Economics, 2018, 50, (6), 659-675 View citations (28)
    See also Working Paper What are the Top Five Journals in Economics? A New Meta–ranking, MPRA Paper (2017) View citations (18) (2017)
50. Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations
    Scientometrics, 2018, 115, (2), 1101-1105 View citations (2)
51. Zur Messung von Forschungsleistungen in der Effizienzanalyse: Drittmittel versus Publikationen
    ifo Schnelldienst, 2018, 71, (16), 26-30 View citations (1)
52. “Smart girls†versus “sleeping beauties†in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2018, 69, (3), 359-367 View citations (4)

2017

53. An empirical look at the nature index
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2017, 68, (3), 653-659 View citations (4)
54. Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings
    Scientometrics, 2017, 110, (2), 1077-1079 View citations (8)
55. Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data
    Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11, (3), 613-628 View citations (12)
56. Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?
    Scientometrics, 2017, 112, (3), 1859-1864 View citations (3)
    See also Working Paper Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?, MPRA Paper (2017) View citations (4) (2017)
57. Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data
    Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11, (3), 788-799 View citations (28)
58. Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany
    Scientometrics, 2017, 111, (1), 543-545 View citations (4)
59. Confidence intervals for Journal Impact Factors
    Scientometrics, 2017, 111, (3), 1869-1871 View citations (6)
60. Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?
    Scientometrics, 2017, 110, (2), 937-943 View citations (19)
61. Ein Meta-Ranking volkswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften
    ifo Schnelldienst, 2017, 70, (16), 40-42
62. Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification
    Scientometrics, 2017, 110, (3), 1601-1614 View citations (11)
63. How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data
    Scientometrics, 2017, 110, (3), 1209-1216 View citations (15)
64. Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2017, 68, (4), 1036-1047 View citations (19)
65. Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley Data
    Research Evaluation, 2017, 26, (3), 230-241 View citations (8)
66. Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press)
    Scientometrics, 2017, 111, (3), 1857-1859 View citations (4)
67. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2017, 68, (4), 1064-1067 View citations (4)
68. Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method
    Scientometrics, 2017, 113, (3), 1665-1680 View citations (5)
69. Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data
    Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11, (1), 164-175 View citations (23)
70. Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming
    Scientometrics, 2017, 112, (2), 1079-1092
71. Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy
    Scientometrics, 2017, 110, (1), 335-353 View citations (9)

2016

72. A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (1), 200-211 View citations (16)
73. At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109, (2), 723-767 View citations (17)
74. Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references—a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109, (2), 1397-1415 View citations (15)
75. Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (3), 875-887 View citations (12)
76. Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109, (3), 2077-2091 View citations (4)
77. Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (4), 902-918 View citations (8)
78. Detecting the historical roots of tribology research: a bibliometric analysis
    Scientometrics, 2016, 107, (1), 305-313 View citations (6)
79. Excellence networks in science: A Web-based application based on Bayesian multilevel logistic regression (BMLR) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (1), 312-327 View citations (9)
80. Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (12), 3095-3100 View citations (4)
81. How much does the expected number of citations for a publication change if it contains the address of a specific scientific institute? A new approach for the analysis of citation data on the institutional level based on regression models
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (9), 2274-2282 View citations (2)
82. How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index
    Scientometrics, 2016, 107, (3), 1405-1422 View citations (15)
83. Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (2), 503-515 View citations (31)
84. Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany
    Scientometrics, 2016, 107, (3), 1041-1061 View citations (11)
85. New features of CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer)
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109, (3), 2049-2051 View citations (1)
86. Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (1), 62-73 View citations (15)
87. Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (3), 776-788 View citations (8)
88. Overlay maps based on Mendeley data: The use of altmetrics for readership networks
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (12), 3064-3072 View citations (3)
89. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109, (3), 1477-1495 View citations (27)
90. Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report
    Scientometrics, 2016, 109, (3), 2129-2150 View citations (43)
91. Replicability and the public/private divide
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (7), 1777-1778 View citations (1)
92. Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis
    Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10, (4), 1225-1232 View citations (11)
93. The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (11), 2778-2789 View citations (16)
94. The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies”
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (3), 707-714 View citations (34)
95. What do altmetrics counts mean? A plea for content analyses
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67, (4), 1016-1017 View citations (8)

2015

96. Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics
    Scientometrics, 2015, 103, (3), 1123-1144 View citations (49)
97. An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany
    Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (2), 1781-1793 View citations (13)
98. BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (7), 1507-1513 View citations (27)
99. Complex tasks and simple solutions: The use of heuristics in the evaluation of research
    Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (8), 1738-1739 View citations (1)
100. Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today?
     Research Evaluation, 2015, 24, (1), 30-36 View citations (2)
101. Discussion about the new Nature Index
     Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (2), 1829-1830 View citations (2)
102. Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (12), 2715-2716 View citations (3)
103. Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time
     Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9, (3), 419-429 View citations (20)
104. Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers’ database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany
     Scientometrics, 2015, 105, (3), 1997-2003 View citations (4)
105. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (11), 2215-2222 View citations (152)
106. How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study
     Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (2), 1101-1117 View citations (32)
107. How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (12), 2711-2713
108. Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (12), 2415-2426 View citations (11)
109. Letter to the Editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications
     Scientometrics, 2015, 103, (3), 1145-1148 View citations (2)
110. Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?
     Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9, (2), 408-418 View citations (45)
111. Nature's top 100 revisited
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (10), 2166-2166
112. On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science
     Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (2), 1823-1827 View citations (26)
113. Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of “Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy” (RPYS)
     Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (3), 1987-1996 View citations (6)
114. Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (11), 2321-2339 View citations (3)
115. The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures
     Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (3), 2187-2188
116. Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations)
     Scientometrics, 2015, 102, (1), 455-463 View citations (7)
117. Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2015, 66, (10), 2146-2148 View citations (10)
118. Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley
     Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9, (3), 477-487 View citations (10)

2014

119. Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS)
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (4), 751-764 View citations (50)
120. Distributions instead of single numbers: Percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (1), 206-208 View citations (5)
121. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics
     Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, (4), 895-903 View citations (107)
122. From P100 to P100': A new citation-rank approach
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (9), 1939-1943 View citations (6)
123. Gould, T.H.P. ( 2013 ). Do we still need peer review? An argument for change. Scarecrow Press: Plymouth, UK
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (1), 209-213 View citations (2)
124. How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature
     Research Evaluation, 2014, 23, (2), 166-173 View citations (31)
125. How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons
     Scientometrics, 2014, 98, (1), 211-219 View citations (14)
126. How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations
     Scientometrics, 2014, 98, (1), 487-509 View citations (47)
127. How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?
     Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, (1), 175-180 View citations (47)
128. Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics?
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (3), 647-648 View citations (10)
129. On scientific misconduct
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (5), 1089-1090
130. On the function of university rankings
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (2), 428-429 View citations (1)
131. On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (4), 866-867
132. Ranking institutions by the handicap principle
     Scientometrics, 2014, 100, (2), 603-604
133. Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST
     Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, (1), 162-174 View citations (16)
134. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations
     Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, (3), 606-617 View citations (32)
135. The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (10), 2160-2161
136. The wisdom of citing scientists
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (6), 1288-1292 View citations (19)
137. Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches
     Scientometrics, 2014, 99, (3), 839-844 View citations (13)
138. Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime
     Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, (4), 935-950 View citations (35)
139. What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide
     Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, (3), 581-593 View citations (26)
140. What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 65, (4), 732-736 View citations (2)

2013

141. Do Universities or Research Institutions With a Specific Subject Profile Have an Advantage or a Disadvantage in Institutional Rankings? A Latent Class Analysis With Data From the SCImago Ranking
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (11), 2310-2316 View citations (13)
142. Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings?
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (11), 2310-2316 View citations (15)
143. Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (11), 2299-2309 View citations (22)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (11), 2299-2309 (2013) View citations (18)
144. How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (1), 96-107 View citations (12)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (1), 96-107 (2013) View citations (12)
145. How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (3), 587-595 View citations (29)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (3), 587-595 (2013) View citations (28)
146. How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects
     Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, (2), 562-574 View citations (29)
147. Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (8), 1649-1658 View citations (21)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (8), 1649-1658 (2013) View citations (5)
148. Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent
     Publications, 2013, 1, (3), 1-12 View citations (2)
149. Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012)
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (6), 1306-1308 View citations (2)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (6), 1306-1308 (2013) View citations (2)
150. The Normalization of Citation Counts Based on Classification Systems
     Publications, 2013, 1, (2), 1-9 View citations (8)
151. The emergence of plate tectonics and the Kuhnian model of paradigm shift: a bibliometric case study based on the Anna Karenina principle
     Scientometrics, 2013, 94, (2), 595-614 View citations (8)
152. The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations
     Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, (3), 722-729 View citations (14)
153. The problem of percentile rank scores used with small reference sets
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (3), 650-650 View citations (2)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (3), 650-650 (2013) View citations (2)
154. The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis
     Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, (1), 84-88 View citations (15)
155. The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach
     Scientometrics, 2013, 97, (2), 421-434 View citations (29)
156. The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits
     Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, (1), 158-165 View citations (72)
157. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000
     Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, (2), 286-291 View citations (33)
158. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013, 64, (2), 217-233 View citations (143)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, (2), 217-233 (2013) View citations (138)
159. Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100)
     Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, (4), 933-944 View citations (24)

2012

160. A New Family of Cumulative Indexes for Measuring Scientific Performance
     PLOS ONE, 2012, 7, (10), 1-4 View citations (3)
161. Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?
     Scientometrics, 2012, 91, (3), 843-856 View citations (12)
162. Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach
     PLOS ONE, 2012, 7, (10), 1-10 View citations (14)
163. HistCite analysis of papers constituting the h index research front
     Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6, (2), 285-288 View citations (6)
164. In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
     Scientometrics, 2012, 93, (3), 915-929 View citations (2)
165. Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 63, (7), 1442-1458 View citations (15)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63, (7), 1442-1458 (2012) View citations (15)
166. Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative
     Scientometrics, 2012, 91, (3), 751-771 View citations (5)
167. Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63, (9), 1901-1902 View citations (6)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 63, (9), 1901-1902 (2012) View citations (7)
168. Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information
     Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6, (4), 505-512 View citations (2)
169. Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking
     Scientometrics, 2012, 92, (3), 781-783 View citations (8)
170. The Anna Karenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 63, (10), 2037-2051 View citations (6)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63, (10), 2037-2051 (2012) View citations (6)
171. The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review
     Scientometrics, 2012, 91, (3), 857-862 View citations (6)
172. The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor
     Scientometrics, 2012, 92, (2), 277-279
173. Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund's final project report data
     Research Evaluation, 2012, 22, (2), 118-133 View citations (1)
174. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?
     Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6, (1), 11-18 View citations (69)
175. Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches
     Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6, (2), 336-345 View citations (8)

2011

176. A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
     Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5, (3), 346-359 View citations (95)
177. A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?
     Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2011, 174, (4), 857-879 View citations (29)
178. A proposal for a First-Citation-Speed-Index
     Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5, (1), 181-186 View citations (8)
179. Do we need the E-index in addition to the h-index and its variants?
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62, (7), 1433-1434 View citations (1)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, (7), 1433-1434 (2011)
180. Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry
     Scientometrics, 2011, 89, (3), 835-843 View citations (5)
181. How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, (2), 217-229 View citations (44)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62, (2), 217-229 (2011) View citations (49)
182. Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, (11), 2133-2146 View citations (68)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62, (11), 2133-2146 (2011) View citations (69)
183. Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes
     Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62, (1), 61-71 View citations (13)
     Also in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, (1), 61-71 (2011) View citations (12)
184. Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data
     Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5, (4), 537-546 View citations (21)
185. Mimicry in science?
     Scientometrics, 2011, 86, (1), 173-177 View citations (12)
186. The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science—A visualization approach by using density maps
     Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5, (4), 547-553 View citations (12)
187. The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
     Scientometrics, 2011, 86, (1), 93-97 View citations (3)
188. Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, (7), 1370-1381 View citations (71)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62, (7), 1370-1381 (2011) View citations (72)
189. Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, (10), 1954-1962 View citations (26)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62, (10), 1954-1962 (2011) View citations (27)

2010

190. A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
     PLOS ONE, 2010, 5, (12), 1-10 View citations (24)
191. A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?
     Scientometrics, 2010, 83, (2), 493-506 View citations (11)
192. A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications
     Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4, (3), 211-220 View citations (24)
193. Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition
     Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4, (1), 83-88 View citations (12)
194. From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
     Research Evaluation, 2010, 19, (2), 105-118 View citations (5)
195. How accurately does Thomas Kuhn’s model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology?
     Scientometrics, 2010, 84, (2), 441-464 View citations (3)
196. Panel peer review of grant applications: what do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decision-making in groups?
     Research Evaluation, 2010, 19, (4), 293-304 View citations (8)
197. Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61, (10), 2061-2069 View citations (3)
     Also in Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2010, 61, (10), 2061-2069 (2010) View citations (3)
198. The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index
     Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4, (3), 444-446 View citations (12)
199. The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy
     Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4, (3), 407-414 View citations (8)
200. The validity of staff editors’ initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition
     Scientometrics, 2010, 85, (3), 681-687 View citations (1)

2009

201. Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data
     Research Evaluation, 2009, 18, (3), 185-190 View citations (12)
202. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts
     Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3, (1), 27-35 View citations (26)
203. Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60, (6), 1286-1289 View citations (10)
204. Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition
     Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3, (4), 348-352 View citations (14)
205. Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition
     Research Evaluation, 2009, 18, (4), 262-272 View citations (8)
206. The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models
     Scientometrics, 2009, 81, (2), 407-411 View citations (5)
207. Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60, (8), 1664-1670

2008

208. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59, (5), 830-837 View citations (139)
209. Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication
     Scientometrics, 2008, 77, (3), 415-432 View citations (14)
210. Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
     PLOS ONE, 2008, 3, (10), 1-11 View citations (27)
211. How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study
     Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2, (4), 280-287 View citations (8)
212. Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data
     Research Evaluation, 2008, 17, (2), 149-156 View citations (19)
213. Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review
     Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2, (3), 217-228 View citations (8)
214. Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59, (11), 1841-1852 View citations (24)

2007

215. Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index
     Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1, (3), 204-213 View citations (13)
216. Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications
     Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1, (1), 83-91 View citations (9)
217. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis
     Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1, (3), 226-238 View citations (53)
218. Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58, (8), 1100-1107 View citations (27)
219. Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review
     Scientometrics, 2007, 73, (2), 139-147 View citations (2)
220. What do we know about the h index?
     Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58, (9), 1381-1385 View citations (140)

2006

221. Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study
     Research Evaluation, 2006, 15, (3), 209-219 View citations (10)
222. Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants
     Scientometrics, 2006, 68, (3), 427-440 View citations (28)

2005

223. Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications
     Research Evaluation, 2005, 14, (1), 15-20 View citations (8)
224. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
     Scientometrics, 2005, 65, (3), 391-392 View citations (97)
225. Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions
     Scientometrics, 2005, 63, (2), 297-320 View citations (35)

2004

226. Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders
     Scientometrics, 2004, 61, (1), 19-41 View citations (4)

Software Items

2018

1. BIBREP: Stata module to produce a bibliometric report on a single senior researcher
   Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics
2. PLOTRPYS: Stata module to plot a spectrogram using CSV export from CRExplorer
   Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics

2017

3. BABIBPLOT: Stata module to plot two graph types which are rooted in Bland-Altman plots using journal and paper percentiles
   Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics

2012

4. GROUPDIST: Stata module to generate within-group minimum and maximum distances
   Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics
5. WOSADDRESS: Stata module to convert datasets from Web of Science data from wide to long
   Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics
6. WOSLOAD: Stata module to load datasets from Web of Science data
   Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics