A note on weak \infty-Chichilnisky rules

Luc Lauwers

Social Choice and Welfare, 1997, vol. 14, issue 2, 357-358

Abstract: There does not exist a weak \infty-Chichilnisky rule as defined in Candeal et al. (1992).

Date: 1997
Note: Received: 5 November 1992/Accepted: 22 April 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00355/papers/7014002/70140357.pdf (application/pdf)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/0035 ... 14002/70140357.ps.gz (application/postscript)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:14:y:1997:i:2:p:357-358

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355

Access Statistics for this article

Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe

More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().