Equitable agendas: agendas ensuring identical sincere and sophisticated voting decisions
K. B. Reid
Additional contact information
K. B. Reid: Department of Mathematics, California State University, San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096-0001, USA
Social Choice and Welfare, 1997, vol. 14, issue 3, 363-377
Abstract:
Sophisticated voting under amendment procedure using majority rule usually results in a decision that is distinct from the decision obtained through sincere voting. In this article it is shown that the underlying majority tournament (determined by the voters' preferences) admits an agenda so that the sincere and sophisticated decisions are identical if and only if the initial strong component of the tournament is not a 3-cycle. As a result, most tournaments, in an asymptotic sense, admit an agenda so that the sincere and sophisticated decisions are identical.
Date: 1997
Note: Received: 31 August 1993/Accepted: 28 August 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00355/papers/7014003/70140363.pdf (application/pdf)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/0035 ... 14003/70140363.ps.gz (application/postscript)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:14:y:1997:i:3:p:363-377
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355
Access Statistics for this article
Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe
More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().