On the separability of assembly preferences
Jean-Pierre BenoÏt () and
Lewis A. Kornhauser ()
Additional contact information
Jean-Pierre BenoÏt: School of Law, New York University, 40 Washington Square South, Room 314E, New York, NY 10012, USA
Lewis A. Kornhauser: School of Law, New York University, 40 Washington Square South, Room 314E, New York, NY 10012, USA
Social Choice and Welfare, 1999, vol. 16, issue 3, 429-439
Abstract:
Analyses of assembly elections often assume that voters have well-defined preferences over candidates, even though preferences over assemblies are the natural analytic starting point. This candidate-based approach is usually justified by an assumption that preferences over assemblies are separable. We show, however, that if preferences over assemblies are themselves derived from underlying preferences over legislative or economic outcomes, then preferences over assemblies will not in general be separable.
Date: 1999-05-11
Note: Received: 23 June 1997/Accepted: 3 March 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00355/papers/9016003/90160429.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:16:y:1999:i:3:p:429-439
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355
Access Statistics for this article
Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe
More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().