Welfare-reducing growth despite individual and government optimization

Siang Ng () and Yew-Kwang Ng ()
Additional contact information
Siang Ng: Department of Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Australia 3168

Social Choice and Welfare, 2001, vol. 18, issue 3, 497-506

Abstract: In the presence of substantial relative-income effects and environmental disruption effects, economic growth may be welfare-reducing even if each and all individuals are optimizing and eagerly trying to make more money and the government also maximizes the welfare of individuals by the choice of income-tax rate and the ratio devoted to the abatement of environmental disruption. Welfare-reducing growth may be avoided if environmental disruption may be directed taxed at low costs and/or government spending on public goods is not environmentally disruptive.

Date: 2001-07-12
Note: Received: 2 September 1998/Accepted: 16 February 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00355/papers/1018003/10180497.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:18:y:2001:i:3:p:497-506

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355

Access Statistics for this article

Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe

More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().