(In)efficient public-goods provision through contests
Martin Kolmar () and
Dana Sisak
Social Choice and Welfare, 2014, vol. 43, issue 1, 239-259
Abstract:
We ask if awarding multiple prizes in a contest can be used to provide efficient incentives for the production of a public good with heterogeneous producers. With two types of individuals, efficiency can only be guaranteed if the following conditions are met: (i) the contest designer can use at least two prize spreads, (ii) there is a sufficient number of individuals of each type, (iii) low-productivity types don’t have much stronger preferences for the public good and (iv) the contest designer can enforce non-monotonic prize schemes. Our findings show that the challenges from heterogeneity can be overcome by an adequate choice of prizes under the above conditions, but that heterogeneity can also severely limit the usefulness of relative-performance measures. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00355-013-0769-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:43:y:2014:i:1:p:239-259
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-013-0769-4
Access Statistics for this article
Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe
More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().