EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring voting power in games with correlated votes using Bahadur’s parametrisation

Serguei Kaniovski and Sreejith Das

Social Choice and Welfare, 2015, vol. 44, issue 2, 349-367

Abstract: We introduce a method of measuring voting power in simple voting games with correlated votes using the Bahadur parameterisation. With a method for measuring voting power with correlated votes, we can address a question of practical importance. Given that most of the applied power analysis is carried out with either the Penrose–Banzhaf or the Shapley–Shubik measures of power, what happens when you use these two measures in games with correlated votes? Simulations of all possible voting games with up to six players show that both measures tend to overestimate power when the votes are positively correlated. Yet, in most voting scenarios, the Shapley–Shubik index is closer to the probability of criticality than the Penrose–Banzhaf measure. This also holds for the power distribution in the EU Council of Ministers. Based on these simulations, we conclude that, while the Penrose–Banzhaf measure may be ideal for designing constitutional assemblies, the Shapley–Shubik index is better suited for the analysis of power distributions beyond the constitutional stage. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00355-014-0831-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:349-367

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355

DOI: 10.1007/s00355-014-0831-x

Access Statistics for this article

Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe

More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:349-367