Condorcet winning sets
Edith Elkind (),
Jérôme Lang () and
Abdallah Saffidine ()
Social Choice and Welfare, 2015, vol. 44, issue 3, 493-517
Abstract:
An alternative is said to be a Condorcet winner of an election if it is preferred to any other alternative by a majority of voters. While this is a very attractive solution concept, many elections do not have a Condorcet winner. In this paper, we propose a set-valued relaxation of this concept, which we call a Condorcet winning set: such sets consist of alternatives that collectively dominate any other alternative. We also consider a more general version of this concept, where instead of domination by a majority of voters we require domination by a given fraction $$\theta $$ θ of voters; we refer to such sets as $$\theta $$ θ -winning sets. We explore social choice-theoretic and algorithmic aspects of these solution concepts, both theoretically and empirically. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00355-014-0853-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:493-517
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-014-0853-4
Access Statistics for this article
Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe
More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().