EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fundamental utilitarianism and intergenerational equity with extinction discounting

Graciela Chichilnisky (), Peter Hammond () and Nicholas Stern ()
Additional contact information
Nicholas Stern: Department of Economics, and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science

Social Choice and Welfare, 2020, vol. 54, issue 2, No 11, 397-427

Abstract: Abstract Ramsey famously condemned discounting “future enjoyments” as “ethically indefensible”. Suppes enunciated an equity criterion which, when social choice is utilitarian, implies giving equal weight to all individuals’ utilities. By contrast, Arrow (Contemporary economic issues. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1999a; Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, Resources for the Future Press, Washington DC, 1999b) accepted, perhaps reluctantly, what he called Koopmans’ (Econometrica 28(2):287–309, 1960) “strong argument” implying that no equitable preference ordering exists for a sufficiently unrestricted domain of infinite utility streams. Here we derive an equitable utilitarian objective for a finite population based on a version of the Vickrey–Harsanyi original position, where there is an equal probability of becoming each person. For a potentially infinite population facing an exogenous stochastic process of extinction, an equitable extinction biased original position requires equal conditional probabilities, given that the individual’s generation survives the extinction process. Such a position is well-defined if and only if survival probabilities decline fast enough for the expected total number of individuals who can ever live to be finite. Then, provided that each individual’s utility is bounded both above and below, maximizing expected “extinction discounted” total utility—as advocated, inter alia, by the Stern Review on climate change—provides a coherent and dynamically consistent equitable objective, even when the population size of each generation can be chosen.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00355-019-01236-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Fundamental Utilitarianism and Intergenerational Equity with Extinction Discounting (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Fundamental utilitarianism and intergenerational equity with extinction discounting (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Fundamental Utilitarianism and Intergenerational Equity with Extinction Discounting (2019) Downloads
Working Paper: Fundamental Utilitarianism and Intergenerational Equity with Extinction Discounting (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:54:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s00355-019-01236-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355

DOI: 10.1007/s00355-019-01236-z

Access Statistics for this article

Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe

More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-17
Handle: RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:54:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s00355-019-01236-z