EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Two principles for two-person social choice

Olivier Cailloux, Matías Núñez () and M. Remzi Sanver
Additional contact information
Olivier Cailloux: Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, CNRS, LAMSADE
Matías Núñez: CREST, CNRS, École Polytechnique, GENES, ENSAE Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris
M. Remzi Sanver: Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, CNRS, LAMSADE

Social Choice and Welfare, 2025, vol. 65, issue 1, No 3, 69-89

Abstract: Abstract We consider two-person ordinal collective choice from an axiomatic perspective. We identify two principles: minimal Rawlsianism (the chosen alternatives belong to the upper-half of both individuals’ preferences) and the equal loss principle (the chosen alternatives ensure that both individuals concede “as equally as possible” from their highest ranked alternative). The equal loss principle has variants of different strength, depending on the precise definition of “as equally as possible”. We consider all prominent ordinal two-person social choice rules of the literature and explore which of these principles they satisfy. Moreover, we show that minimal Rawlsianism is logically incompatible with one version of the equal loss principle that we call the minimal dispersion principle. On the other hand, there are social choice rules that satisfy the Rawlsian minimal dispersion principle where the minimal dispersion principle is restricted to alternatives within the upper-half of both individuals’ preferences.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00355-024-01560-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:65:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00355-024-01560-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... c+theory/journal/355

DOI: 10.1007/s00355-024-01560-z

Access Statistics for this article

Social Choice and Welfare is currently edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Marc Fleurbaey, Elizabeth Maggie Penn and Clemens Puppe

More articles in Social Choice and Welfare from Springer, The Society for Social Choice and Welfare Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-11
Handle: RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:65:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00355-024-01560-z