Gender disparities in perceived life satisfaction within food insecure populations

Elizabeth Graham (), Diana Dallmann and Hugo Melgar-Quiñonez
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Graham: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Diana Dallmann: McGill Institute for Global Food Security
Hugo Melgar-Quiñonez: McGill Institute for Global Food Security

Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, 2019, vol. 11, issue 3, No 2, 493-502

Abstract: Abstract Women are over-represented globally among the food insecure population, yet only recently have analyses on gender differences in perceived life satisfaction (LS) controlled for food insecurity (FI). This research hypothesizes that FI is a strong determinant of low LS and that at the same FI level, women will report lower perceived LS than men. Using data collected through the 2014 Gallup® World Poll, which included the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), responses to the FIES (8 questions) comprised the FI variable, with 0 affirmative responses denoting food security, and 1–8 affirmative responses denoting FI. A single well-being question (adapted from Hadley Cantril’s Self-Anchoring Striving Scale) comprised the LS variable, with possible answers ranged 0–10. Responses of 4 or lower denoted “lower LS”, versus 5–10 denoting “higher LS”. Cross-sectional data from 142 countries shows that, globally, women had higher odds for FI than men in both uncontrolled (Odds Ratio: 1.14, 95% CI = 1.11–1.16), as well as controlled models (Odds Ratio: 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.07). Those who were food insecure had significantly higher odds of perceiving low LS (Odds Ratio: 3.25, 95% CI = 3.14–3.36). Men were less likely to report higher LS than their female counterparts (Odds Ratio: 0.83, 95% CI = 0.81–0.86) when controlling for FI. This research provides evidence of differing reports of LS between men and women who experience the same FI status, calling for continued research on why reported LS is lower for men when controlling for FI, what the consequences are for food insecure populations, and what implications exist for national policies.

Keywords: Food security; Food access; Gender; Subjective well-being; Experience-based scales; Measurement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-019-00932-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:11:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12571-019-00932-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ulture/journal/12571

DOI: 10.1007/s12571-019-00932-z

Access Statistics for this article

Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food is currently edited by R.N. Strange

More articles in Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food from Springer, The International Society for Plant Pathology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().