Maize storage losses, climate, and climate change in Zambia

Hugo De Groote, Zachary M. Gitonga () and Kai Sonder ()
Additional contact information
Zachary M. Gitonga: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT)
Kai Sonder: CIMMYT

Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, 2023, vol. 15, issue 4, No 3, 879-899

Abstract: Abstract Maize is the major food staple in Eastern and Southern Africa; it is mostly produced and stored on small-scale farms, prone to storage losses from pests (in particular maize weevils and larger grain borer, LGB), and likely to be affected by climate change. To target interventions to reduce storage losses, good loss estimates are needed, but obtaining representative scientific observations is expensive. Alternatively, losses can be obtained from farmers’ estimates. In this paper, representative farmer survey data from Zambia are combined with climate data to estimate storage losses, analyze their relationship with climate, and estimate the effect of climate change on storage losses. Farmers did not generally consider storage pests to be a major problem, and indeed, losses in maize stored as grain are modest at 11.5%, but losses in cobs are much higher at 18.7%. Total losses were estimated at 25.4%, or a quantity of 656,000 tonnes, valued at US$ 198 million, but these varied considerably between regions (from 7.8% to 35.4%) and districts (up to 41.2%). A logistic model was estimated, with a strong relationship between losses and climate (temperature and relative humidity). Relative losses were extrapolated over the country and multiplied with maize production to calculate absolute losses and their geographic distribution; they were found to be highly concentrated in three provinces, with half of the losses found in just 11 districts. An increase in average annual temperature of 1 °C was estimated to increase losses to 29.7%, or 177,000 tonnes of maize. The study concluded that farmer surveys to estimate georeferenced losses, in combination with climate data, provide good tools to estimate storage losses, focus interventions on reducing storage pests to the most important geographic areas. Further, the methodology is convenient to predict future losses due to climate change, but the accuracy of the predictions still needs to be verified. It was further recommended that extension efforts focus on reducing storage time in cobs, as grain can be better protected, especially with hermetic storage technologies, and concentrate on the priority districts identified here.

Keywords: Maize; Storage losses; Zambia; Climate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-023-01347-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:15:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12571-023-01347-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ulture/journal/12571

DOI: 10.1007/s12571-023-01347-7

Access Statistics for this article

Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food is currently edited by R.N. Strange

More articles in Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food from Springer, The International Society for Plant Pathology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().