 Food and nutrition security merits of intercropping maize, sorghum and millet with legumes on small farms in Southern AfricaIsaiah Nyagumbo (),
Donald Nyamayevu and
João Vasco Silva
Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, 2025, vol. 17, issue 5, No 17, 1317-1332 Abstract: Abstract African agriculture faces an unprecedented challenge to ensure food and nutrition security while adapting to climate change and coping with land fragmentation due to population growth. This study assessed the performance of sole cereal (maize, sorghum, millet) and cereal-legume intercropping systems in terms of grain, energy and protein yield, determining the land requirements for energy and protein self-sufficiency at the household level. On-farm trials were established in two districts of Malawi (Dedza and Mzimba) to test twelve cropping systems on 72 farms for three consecutive cropping seasons, resulting in 2,530 yield records. The results revealed that crop yields were much higher in Dedza than in Mzimba, reflecting the better agro-ecological potential in the former. Sole maize yielded 2.8 t ha−1 in Dedza while sole sorghum yielded 1.6 t ha−1 and sole millet yielded 1.7 t ha−1, and in Mzimba, sole maize yielded 2.0 t ha−1, with sorghum and millet yielding 0.9 t ha−1and 0.7 t ha−1, respectively. Across both districts, maize-legume intercrops yielded an average cereal component of 1.7–2.4 t ha⁻1. In comparison, sorghum-legume intercrops produced lower cereal yields ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 t ha⁻1, while millet-legume intercrops ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 t ha⁻1. Yet, the cereal-legume intercrops provided higher nutritional yields than sole cereals. Thus in Dedza, maize-legume intercrops met energy and protein nutritional security needs (based on annual requirements for 5 adults) for 87–96% of the farms, thereby enabling land sparing of 0.83–0.94 ha farm−1. Similarly, in Mzimba, maize-legume intercrops enabled farmers to meet energy and protein requirements for 70–88% of farms, thereby sparing 0.61–0.71 ha of land farm−1. At both sites, sorghum- and millet-legume intercrops were less effective than maize-legume intercrops. Therefore, maize cropping systems, particularly when intercropped with legumes, are the most viable option for achieving food and nutrition security in land-constrained settings and in agro-ecological environments similar to Dedza and Mzimba. Meeting energy and protein requirements with small grains remains challenging in densely populated areas with small farm sizes, as these crops yield far less than maize, hence the commonly observed preference for maize by farmers. Caution is advised for research and development programs targeting small grains in Malawi’s smallholder settings, as this may compromise energy and protein outputs at the farm level. Keywords: Climate change adaptation; Crop diversification; Systems agronomy; Agricultural development; Total system productivity; Land requirements (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:17:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s12571-025-01556-2 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/s12571-025-01556-2 Access Statistics for this article Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food is currently edited by R.N. Strange More articles in Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food from Springer, The International Society for Plant Pathology |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.