EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Maize yield response, nitrogen use efficiency and financial returns to fertilizer on smallholder farms in southern Africa

Bashir Jama, David Kimani (), Rebbie Harawa, Abednego Kiwia Mavuthu and Gudeta W. Sileshi
Additional contact information
Bashir Jama: Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)
David Kimani: Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)
Rebbie Harawa: Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)
Abednego Kiwia Mavuthu: Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)

Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, 2017, vol. 9, issue 3, 577-593

Abstract: Abstract Maize is considered as “life” in southern Africa because it is the staple food crop and the main component of food aid interventions. However, its productivity is very low, partly because of the limited use of external inputs. Although maize response to fertilizer has been the focus for many years of studies on research stations, information is scanty on the level of crop response and profitability on smallholder farms in most parts of southern Africa. Therefore, the objective of the present analysis was to determine yield responses, nitrogen use efficiency and returns to investment in fertilizer in the unimodal rainfall region of southern Africa. This analysis compared yield responses to various rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer with maize grown without external inputs (absolute control) on a total of 940 demonstration sites in 47 districts across Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and the southern highlands of Tanzania. Across the sites, average yields were 1.6 t ha−1 in the control, 2.8 t ha−1 with ≤50% of the recommended N rate and 4 t ha−1 where 100% or more of the recommended N rate was applied. Except in Zambia, agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity of N were higher with 50% of the recommended N rate compared to 100% of the recommended N rate. Net present values (NPV) were also positive in over 50% of the cases, indicating that investments in N fertilizer will generate profits over time. In contrast, for maize grown without N fertilizer, NPVs were negative in over 68% of the cases across the four countries. The value-cost ratio was >2 with the various N rates at the aggregate level, but it was

Keywords: Food security; Net present value; Value-cost ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-017-0674-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:9:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12571-017-0674-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ulture/journal/12571

Access Statistics for this article

Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food is currently edited by R.N. Strange

More articles in Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food from Springer, The International Society for Plant Pathology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2019-05-21
Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:9:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12571-017-0674-2