EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A comparison of the $$L_2$$ L 2 minimum distance estimator and the EM-algorithm when fitting $${\varvec{{k}}}$$ k -component univariate normal mixtures

Brenton R. Clarke (), Thomas Davidson and Robert Hammarstrand
Additional contact information
Brenton R. Clarke: Murdoch University
Thomas Davidson: Australian Bureau of Statistics
Robert Hammarstrand: Murdoch University

Statistical Papers, 2017, vol. 58, issue 4, No 13, 1247-1266

Abstract: Abstract The method of maximum likelihood using the EM-algorithm for fitting finite mixtures of normal distributions is the accepted method of estimation ever since it has been shown to be superior to the method of moments. Recent books testify to this. There has however been criticism of the method of maximum likelihood for this problem, the main criticism being when the variances of component distributions are unequal the likelihood is in fact unbounded and there can be multiple local maxima. Another major criticism is that the maximum likelihood estimator is not robust. Several alternative minimum distance estimators have since been proposed as a way of dealing with the first problem. This paper deals with one of these estimators which is not only superior due to its robustness, but in fact can have an advantage in numerical studies even at the model distribution. Importantly, robust alternatives of the EM-algorithm, ostensibly fitting t distributions when in fact the data are mixtures of normals, are also not competitive at the normal mixture model when compared to the chosen minimum distance estimator. It is argued for instance that natural processes should lead to mixtures whose component distributions are normal as a result of the Central Limit Theorem. On the other hand data can be contaminated because of extraneous sources as are typically assumed in robustness studies. This calls for a robust estimator.

Keywords: EM algorithm; Minimum distance estimation; Robust estimation; Monte Carlo simulation; 62F10; 62NO2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-016-0747-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0747-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... business/journal/362

DOI: 10.1007/s00362-016-0747-x

Access Statistics for this article

Statistical Papers is currently edited by C. Müller, W. Krämer and W.G. Müller

More articles in Statistical Papers from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0747-x