Incoherent dose-escalation in phase I trials using the escalation with overdose control approach

Graham M. Wheeler ()
Additional contact information
Graham M. Wheeler: Cambridge Institute of Public Health

Statistical Papers, 2018, vol. 59, issue 2, No 17, 811 pages

Abstract: Abstract A desirable property of any dose-escalation strategy for phase I oncology trials is coherence: if the previous patient experienced a toxicity, a higher dose is not recommended for the next patient; similarly, if the previous patient did not experience a toxicity, a lower dose is not recommended for the next patient. The escalation with overdose control (EWOC) approach is a model-based design that has been applied in practice, under which the dose assigned to the next patient is the one that, given all available data, has a posterior probability of exceeding the maximum tolerated dose equal to a pre-specified value known as the feasibility bound. Several methodological and applied publications have considered the EWOC approach with both feasibility bounds fixed and increasing throughout the trial. Whilst the EWOC approach with fixed feasibility bound has been proven to be coherent, some proposed methods of increasing the feasibility bound regardless of toxicity outcomes of patients can lead to incoherent dose-escalation. This paper formalises a proof that incoherent dose-escalation can occur if the feasibility bound is increased without consideration of preceding toxicity outcomes, and shows via simulation studies that only small increases in the feasibility bound are required for incoherent dose-escalations to occur.

Keywords: Bayesian statistics; Dose-escalation; Adaptive designs; Maximum tolerated dose; Phase I trials; Coherence; 62C10; 92C50; 97K80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-016-0790-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:59:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0790-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... business/journal/362

DOI: 10.1007/s00362-016-0790-7

Access Statistics for this article

Statistical Papers is currently edited by C. Müller, W. Krämer and W.G. Müller

More articles in Statistical Papers from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().