EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing practical relevance of treatment effects

Andrea Ongaro, Sonia Migliorati, Roberto Ascari and Enrico Ripamonti ()
Additional contact information
Andrea Ongaro: University of Milan-Bicocca
Sonia Migliorati: University of Milan-Bicocca
Roberto Ascari: University of Milan-Bicocca
Enrico Ripamonti: University of Brescia

Statistical Papers, 2024, vol. 65, issue 7, No 5, 4145 pages

Abstract: Abstract Traditionally, common testing problems are formalized in terms of a precise null hypothesis representing an idealized situation such as absence of a certain “treatment effect”. However, in most applications the real purpose of the analysis is to assess evidence in favor of a practically relevant effect, rather than simply determining its presence/absence. This discrepancy leads to erroneous inferential conclusions, especially in case of moderate or large sample size. In particular, statistical significance, as commonly evaluated on the basis of a precise hypothesis low p value, bears little or no information on practical significance. This paper presents an innovative approach to the problem of testing the practical relevance of effects. This relies upon the proposal of a general method for modifying standard tests by making them suitable to deal with appropriate interval null hypotheses containing all practically irrelevant effect sizes. In addition, when it is difficult to specify exactly which effect sizes are irrelevant we provide the researcher with a benchmark value. Acceptance/rejection can be established purely by deciding on the (ir)relevance of this value. We illustrate our proposal in the context of many important testing setups, and we apply the proposed methods to two case studies in clinical medicine. First, we consider data on the evaluation of systolic blood pressure in a sample of adult participants at risk for nutritional deficit. Second, we focus on a study of the effects of remdesivir on patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Keywords: Effect size; Precise vs interval hypothesis testing; p value; Nuisance parameter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-024-01549-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01549-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... business/journal/362

DOI: 10.1007/s00362-024-01549-x

Access Statistics for this article

Statistical Papers is currently edited by C. Müller, W. Krämer and W.G. Müller

More articles in Statistical Papers from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01549-x