Critical action learning: a method or strategy for peer supervision of coaching practice

Arthur Turner, David Tee and Sally Crompton

Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2017, vol. 14, issue 1, 53-61

Abstract: This paper deals with the on-going practice of a critical action learning set who come together to meet their needs for coaching supervision as a group of executive coaches working from, and within, the University sector in South Wales. The reasons for the successes of, and the challenges around, this practice of four years standing have been articulated using an academic backdrop. The use of multi-factorial supervision has been heralded as being able to give a more rounded form of supervision which, despite its challenges, has, in this example, stood the test of time. Further data are required to try to understand if this form of supervision provides better coaching to the executive field in South Wales and beyond, and what can be learnt from the practice of supervision in general.

Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2017.1282640 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:alresp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:53-61

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CALR20

DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2017.1282640

Access Statistics for this article

Action Learning: Research and Practice is currently edited by Kiran Trehan and Clare Rigg

More articles in Action Learning: Research and Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().