The innovation paradox: a selective review of the literature on action learning and innovation
Mike Pedler and
Cheryl Brook
Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2017, vol. 14, issue 3, 216-229
Abstract:
This paper explores selective literatures in the two fields of action learning and innovation, and seeks insights into the processes of, and connections between, innovation, engagement and implementation. We searched the action learning articles for references to innovation, beginning with the work of Revans, who highlights the innovation paradox, which becomes a key theme of this paper. We searched the very large innovation literature for references to innovation as a learning process and as a factor in organisational learning. The paper surveys the factors said to enable innovation, and briefly outlines some inhibitors, before considering Revans’ contribution to thinking about innovation. This is followed by a consideration of developments in action learning and innovation since Revans. The findings suggest that paradox theory is a useful way of thinking about innovation, conceived of as a practical problem involving resistances and frequent failures of implementation and adoption, and also propose action learning as a means of working with and addressing paradox. A limitation of this study is its lack of empirical data. Further research could usefully interrogate examples of innovation practices and ask such questions as to why innovation remains so elusive, and how innovative capacities and capabilities can be developed and enhanced.
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2017.1326877 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:alresp:v:14:y:2017:i:3:p:216-229
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CALR20
DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2017.1326877
Access Statistics for this article
Action Learning: Research and Practice is currently edited by Kiran Trehan and Clare Rigg
More articles in Action Learning: Research and Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().