Leadership development through virtual action learning: an evaluation
Kath Aspinwall,
Mike Pedler and
Phil Radcliff
Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2018, vol. 15, issue 1, 40-51
Abstract:
This paper presents a case study based on the evaluation of the two VAL (virtual action learning) sets. We report participants learning both leadership and the VAL process based on the basis of telephone interviews. We conclude that what is learned about leadership is connected with how learning takes place and suggest that the content and process of leadership learning are intermingled and co-produced. Secondly, it seems that what is learned is both common and personal, so that whilst participants' learning could be said to be broadly similar, what is actually learned is also idiosyncratic and unique to that person. Furthermore, whilst understandings of the learning process are widely shared, the significance of what is learned by any individual is only glimpsed by others. We also note the centrality of a “strong” facilitator in the VAL process in contrast to Revans' ascription of this role in action learning.
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2017.1414103 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:alresp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:40-51
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CALR20
DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2017.1414103
Access Statistics for this article
Action Learning: Research and Practice is currently edited by Kiran Trehan and Clare Rigg
More articles in Action Learning: Research and Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().