Leadership development, wicked problems and action learning: provocations to a debate
Aileen Lawless and
Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2019, vol. 16, issue 1, 37-51
The paper examines whether, if leadership is defined by the willingness to tackle wicked issues, and if action learning is employed for leadership development purposes, do the action learning participants on leadership development programmes address such wicked issues? It adopts a version of dialogical sense-making to consider this and describes an attempted literature review which led to a series of questions on academic motivations, puzzles and problems, when exactly a problem is wicked, the possible difference between private and public problems, leader development and leaderful practice. It failed to identify such evidence and it is postulated that this is due to the individual-focused nature of leader development.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:alresp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:37-51
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Action Learning: Research and Practice is currently edited by Kiran Trehan and Clare Rigg
More articles in Action Learning: Research and Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().