Adapting action learning in the legal profession: the role of the ‘provided’ problem

Bernadette McDonald

Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2021, vol. 18, issue 1, 67-74

Abstract: Action learning has evolved with multiple variants and a multiplicity of interpretations which have moved it away from Revans Classical Principles. This account of practice describes the use of an adapted action learning set within the legal profession with a specific focus on a ‘provided’ problem and collective reflective practice in the form of critical reflective questioning. Reformulating the classic action learning equation L (Learning) = P (Practice Knowledge) + Q (Questioning Insight) to L = P (Shared Experience of Practice) + (C)RQ (Critical Reflective Questioning), I reflect upon the way in which the participants engaged with this new approach and consider the adaptivity of action learning within professional legal practice.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2021.1869176 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:alresp:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:67-74

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CALR20

DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2021.1869176

Access Statistics for this article

Action Learning: Research and Practice is currently edited by Kiran Trehan and Clare Rigg

More articles in Action Learning: Research and Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().