The contradictions of impact: action learning and power in organizations

Russ Vince

Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2012, vol. 9, issue 3, 209-218

Abstract: In this polemical essay, Professor Russ Vince argues that it is important to understand the contradictions that can be generated by action learning. This method is a powerful and effective approach to managers' learning that can underpin transformations of management practice. However, any method for learning, no matter how convinced we are of its efficacy, is tied to organizational power relations and their effects. It is likely that the radical potential of action learning sits side-by-side with the political purpose that the use of the approach might serve. Power relations create contradictions in how learning methods are felt, used, and understood. Engaging with the contradictions of action learning has the potential to improve its impact and effectiveness.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2012.722356 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:alresp:v:9:y:2012:i:3:p:209-218

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CALR20

DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2012.722356

Access Statistics for this article

Action Learning: Research and Practice is currently edited by Kiran Trehan and Clare Rigg

More articles in Action Learning: Research and Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().