On Mixture Alternatives and Wilcoxon’s Signed-Rank Test

Jonathan D. Rosenblatt and Yoav Benjamini

The American Statistician, 2018, vol. 72, issue 4, 344-347

Abstract: The shift alternative model has been the canonical alternative hypothesis since the early days of statistics. This holds true both in parametric and nonparametric statistical testing. In this contribution, we argue that in several applications of interest, the shift alternative is dubious while a mixture alternative is more plausible, because the treatment is expected to affect only a subpopulation. When considering mixture hypotheses, classical tests may no longer enjoy their desirable properties. In particular, we show that the t-test may be underpowered compared to Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test, even under a Gaussian null. We consider implications to personalized medicine and medical imaging.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2017.1360795 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:4:p:344-347

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1360795

Access Statistics for this article

The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson

More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().