The Relative Performance Index: Neutralizing Simpson's Paradox

Ernest C. Davenport,, Kyle Nickodem, Mark L. Davison, Gareth Phillips and Edmund Graham

The American Statistician, 2020, vol. 74, issue 2, 116-124

Abstract: Comparing populations on one or more variables is often of interest. These comparisons are typically made using the mean; however, it is well known that mean comparisons can lead to misinterpretation because of Simpson's paradox. Simpson's paradox occurs when there is a differential distribution of subpopulations across the populations being compared and the means of those subpopulations are different. This article develops the relative performance index (RPI) to ameliorate effects of Simpson's paradox. Data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) are used to illustrate use of the new index. The utility of RPI is compared to the population mean and a prior index, the balanced index. This article shows how RPI can be generalized to a variety of contexts with implications for decision making.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2018.1451777 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:74:y:2020:i:2:p:116-124

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1451777

Access Statistics for this article

The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson

More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().