Bias in Small-Sample Inference With Count-Data Models

McKinley L. Blackburn

The American Statistician, 2020, vol. 74, issue 3, 267-273

Abstract: Both Poisson and negative binomial regression can provide quasi-likelihood estimates for coefficients in exponential-mean models that are consistent in the presence of distributional misspecification. It has generally been recommended, however, that inference be carried out using asymptotically robust estimators for the parameter covariance matrix. As with linear models, such robust inference tends to lead to over-rejection of null hypotheses in small samples. Alternative methods for estimating coefficient estimator variances are considered. No one approach seems to remove all test bias, but the results do suggest that the use of the jackknife with Poisson regression tends to be least biased for inference.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2018.1564699 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:74:y:2020:i:3:p:267-273

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1564699

Access Statistics for this article

The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson

More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().