Comparative Probability Metrics: Using Posterior Probabilities to Account for Practical Equivalence in A/B tests

Nathaniel T. Stevens and Luke Hagar

The American Statistician, 2022, vol. 76, issue 3, 224-237

Abstract: Recently, online-controlled experiments (i.e., A/B tests) have become an extremely valuable tool used by internet and technology companies for purposes of advertising, product development, product improvement, customer acquisition, and customer retention to name a few. The data-driven decisions that result from these experiments have traditionally been informed by null hypothesis significance tests and analyses based on p-values. However, recently attention has been drawn to the shortcomings of hypothesis testing, and an emphasis has been placed on the development of new methodologies that overcome these shortcomings. We propose the use of posterior probabilities to facilitate comparisons that account for practical equivalence and that quantify the likelihood that a result is practically meaningful, as opposed to statistically significant. We call these posterior probabilities comparative probability metrics (CPMs). This Bayesian methodology provides a flexible and intuitive means of making meaningful comparisons by directly calculating, for example, the probability that two groups are practically equivalent, or the probability that one group is practically superior to another. In this article, we describe a unified framework for constructing and estimating such probabilities, and we develop a sample size determination methodology that may be used to determine how much data are required to calculate trustworthy CPMs.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2021.2000495 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:224-237

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2021.2000495

Access Statistics for this article

The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson

More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().