Expressing Regret: A Unified View of Credible Intervals

Kenneth Rice and Lingbo Ye

The American Statistician, 2022, vol. 76, issue 3, 248-256

Abstract: Posterior uncertainty is typically summarized as a credible interval, an interval in the parameter space that contains a fixed proportion—usually 95%—of the posterior’s support. For multivariate parameters, credible sets perform the same role. There are of course many potential 95% intervals from which to choose, yet even standard choices are rarely justified in any formal way. In this article we give a general method, focusing on the loss function that motivates an estimate—the Bayes rule—around which we construct a credible set. The set contains all points which, as estimates, would have minimally-worse expected loss than the Bayes rule: we call this excess expected loss “regret.” The approach can be used for any model and prior, and we show how it justifies all widely used choices of credible interval/set. Further examples show how it provides insights into more complex estimation problems. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2039764 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:248-256

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2039764

Access Statistics for this article

The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson

More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().