Zero-Truncated Modelling in a Meta-Analysis on Suicide Data after Bariatric Surgery
Layna Charlie Dennett,
Antony Overstall and
Dankmar Böhning
The American Statistician, 2025, vol. 79, issue 4, 492-499
Abstract:
Meta-analysis is a well-established method for integrating results from several independent studies to estimate a common quantity of interest. However, meta-analysis is prone to selection bias, notably when particular studies are systematically excluded. This can lead to bias in estimating the quantity of interest. Motivated by a meta-analysis to estimate the rate of completed-suicide after bariatric surgery, where studies which reported no suicides were excluded, a novel zero-truncated count modeling approach was developed. This approach addresses heterogeneity, both observed and unobserved, through covariate and overdispersion modeling, respectively. Additionally, through the Horvitz-Thompson estimator, an approach is developed to estimate the number of excluded studies, a quantity of potential interest for researchers. Uncertainty quantification for both estimation of suicide rates and number of excluded studies is achieved through a parametric bootstrapping approach.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2025.2507380 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:amstat:v:79:y:2025:i:4:p:492-499
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTAS20
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2025.2507380
Access Statistics for this article
The American Statistician is currently edited by Eric Sampson
More articles in The American Statistician from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().