Discrimination Creep, Mandate Expansion and the Politicisation of Romania’s Equality Agency

Liviu Andreescu and Gabriel Andreescu

Europe-Asia Studies, 2024, vol. 76, issue 4, 546-573

Abstract: Against the background of literature on equality bodies and bureaucratic expansion, we examine the current crisis of confidence in Romania’s anti-discrimination agency, the National Council for Combating Discrimination (NCCD), a quasi-court. We argue that, through a process of conceptual creep, discrimination has been defined so generously that increasingly trivial acts are now sanctioned. This has generated increased strategic and opportunistic petitioning, with two consequences: raising the stakes of political control over the agency; and the agency’s increasingly difficult conceptual management of discrimination. We document ‘discrimination creep’ by analysing the Council’s case law on ‘discriminatory speech’, though our focus stays on the interaction of bureaucracy, expertise and activism which has enabled creep.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2023.2244198 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:76:y:2024:i:4:p:546-573

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ceas20

DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2023.2244198

Access Statistics for this article

Europe-Asia Studies is currently edited by Terry Cox

More articles in Europe-Asia Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().