Administrative costs in higher education: how fast are they really growing?

David Hedrick, Charles Wassell and Steven Henson

Education Economics, 2009, vol. 17, issue 1, 123-137

Abstract: It is widely believed that administrative expenditures in US higher education are growing too rapidly, particularly in relation to expenditures that are directly related to instruction, and that this so-called 'administrative bloat' is a major factor in the rising cost of higher education. We argue that this perception of rapid growth is exaggerated, and that it results from focusing on simple expenditure aggregates that obscure important variation across institutions. A more careful analysis using panel-data methods supports a more benign conclusion that administrative expenditures, and their ratio to instructional expenditures, are stationary over time. This conclusion is supported by panel unit-root tests. This suggests that some of the concern about the role of administrative expenditures in rising higher-education costs may be misdirected.

Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09645290701523184 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:edecon:v:17:y:2009:i:1:p:123-137

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CEDE20

DOI: 10.1080/09645290701523184

Access Statistics for this article

Education Economics is currently edited by Caren Wareing and Steve Bradley

More articles in Education Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().