EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Dropping out of higher education in France: a micro-economic approach using survival analysis

Nicolas Gury

Education Economics, 2011, vol. 19, issue 1, 51-64

Abstract: Through the use of event-history techniques, we will show that a duration framework is adapted to the analysis of higher education attrition. Our dropout model allows for estimates to vary over time. While some factors exhibit constant effects, like high school characteristics, other effects do vary from the first year to the fourth. Men and women do not generally exhibit the same dropout behaviour. Socio-economic background, and especially the parents' level of education, would appear to be influential only at the beginning of the university period. Results suggest that only well-targeted actions considering both the 'early leavers' and 'late leavers' could serve to increase the internal efficiency of French universities.

Keywords: dropout; event-history analysis; time-varying effects; graduation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09645290902796357 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:edecon:v:19:y:2011:i:1:p:51-64

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CEDE20

DOI: 10.1080/09645290902796357

Access Statistics for this article

Education Economics is currently edited by Caren Wareing and Steve Bradley

More articles in Education Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:19:y:2011:i:1:p:51-64