Heterogeneity in STEM coursework within and across college majors: do college graduates’ earnings depend on major, STEM credits, or both?

Audrey Light and Sydney Schreiner Wertz

Education Economics, 2025, vol. 33, issue 6, 904-928

Abstract: In contrast to studies that identify the expected earnings premium associated with any STEM degree or with specific college majors, we account for workers’ majors and the percent of total college credits completed in STEM courses (STEM intensity). We find that STEM intensity is an important determinant of log-earnings for many STEM and non-STEM majors, and that estimated earnings gaps between pairs of majors can change dramatically when STEM intensity is accounted for. In light of this evidence, we believe policy initiatives focused on drawing students into STEM should emphasize the potential value of STEM coursework for non-STEM majors.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09645292.2024.2444939 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:edecon:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:904-928

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CEDE20

DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2024.2444939

Access Statistics for this article

Education Economics is currently edited by Caren Wareing and Steve Bradley

More articles in Education Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().