Contesting the autonomy of political economy: The early positivist criticism of economic knowledge

Michel Zouboulakis

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2008, vol. 15, issue 1, 85-103

Abstract: A strong critical movement emerged in the mid 1860s based on Auguste Comte's idea of a unified social science. Presented here is the debate over the independence of political economy vis-a-vis the other branches of social science, between Frederic Harrison and John Kells Ingram on the one side, and John Stuart Mill and John Elliot Cairnes on the other. While the independence of political economy was rescued, its policy relevance and public reputation were seriously affected. The positivist reaction helped unintentionally to establish economics with far less relationship to other social disciplines.

Keywords: Comte; Mill; Harrison; Cairnes; Ingram; economics and sociology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672560701858699 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:15:y:2008:i:1:p:85-103

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REJH20

DOI: 10.1080/09672560701858699

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought is currently edited by José Luís Cardoso

More articles in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().