Institutions, economy and politics: the debate between Commons and North

Philippe Broda

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2021, vol. 28, issue 3, 419-435

Abstract: This article compares John R. Commons and Douglass C. North. Both scholars justify the role of institutions by referring to cognitive issues and emphasise power relations as a key concern. However, their perspectives are radically different. North focuses on the barriers to the emergence of “open-access orders” in developing countries. The existence of impersonal norms is supposed to eradicate violence in society. In contrast, Commons is a progressive preoccupied with the survival of capitalism. In his view, through the growth of inequalities, these norms renders the system unstable. The economy has to be bounded at the political level.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2020.1837197 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:419-435

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REJH20

DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2020.1837197

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought is currently edited by José Luís Cardoso

More articles in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().