EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Lowe's and Hayek's influence on Harrod's trade cycle theory

Daniele Besomi

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2002, vol. 9, issue 1, 42-56

Abstract: In 1926 Adolph Lowe pointed out that a system in a state of equilibrium is not capable of undergoing any change, and concluded that trade cycles cannot be explained within the framework of static analysis. Harrod seems to have become acquainted with this argument via Hayek's Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle, where it was expressed in a weaker form. Harrod developed it into his instability principle, maintaining that a correct (endogenous) explanation of the cycle requires that the system is unstable. This argument preceded the actual elaboration of Harrod's cycles and growth mechanism, of which it provides the epistemic foundation.

Keywords: Instability Principle; Business Cycle; Harrod; Lowe; Hayek; Equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672560110103379 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:9:y:2002:i:1:p:42-56

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REJH20

DOI: 10.1080/09672560110103379

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought is currently edited by José Luís Cardoso

More articles in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:9:y:2002:i:1:p:42-56