 Four minutes to four years: the advantage of recombinant over specialized innovation -- RIS3 versus ‘smartspec'Philip Cooke European Planning Studies, 2016, vol. 24, issue 8, 1494-1510 Abstract: Today, the EU has changed its economic development support strategy for regions from a mainly procedural budgeting model to a more substantive one, especially regarding the priority to promote regional innovation. Thus, instead of a regional operational programme that emphasized budgetary controls, phasing and expenditure refinement, this was to be paralleled by a regional innovation strategy (RIS phase 3 or RIS3) to attract EU regional funding assistance. This was a radical departure from all hitherto prevailing ERDF/FEDER methodologies by which regions and their member states submitted such funding requests. This article explores this policy transition, its strengths and weaknesses. In particular, it presents empirically informed accounts of the ways in which RIS3 was received, comprehended and implemented in three regions of Portugal. In addition, it presents results of interviews also conducted with key central state actors in Lisbon. A major aim was to see how each policy level reacted to the way innovation was pre-defined in terms of regional ‘smart specialization' whereby regions dropped un-innovative activities and projected their best candidate specializations. Questioning of the validity of the notion in the innovation context occurs based on both primary and secondary research. A secondary aim was to investigate the methodologies, concepts and policy frameworks actually deployed in developing RIS3s in three Portuguese regions; Algarve, Centro and Norte. Third, another important aim in a follow-up section was to conduct an ex post evaluation of the resulting approved implementation strategy. Discussion and conclusions are drawn in the final section. Date: 2016 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:24:y:2016:i:8:p:1494-1510 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1151482 Access Statistics for this article European Planning Studies is currently edited by Philip Cooke and Louis Albrechts More articles in European Planning Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.