Between Calm and Passion: The Cooling-Off Period and Divorce Decisions in Korea
Dainn Wie () and
Feminist Economics, 2015, vol. 21, issue 2, 187-214
Research in behavioral economics suggests that a cooling-off period can address decision-making errors caused by projection bias, which drives people to make the wrong prediction when affected by an immediate emotional state. Using the unique, natural experiment of a mandated divorce cooling-off period in Korea, a difference-in-differences (DD) estimation of the impact of such a cooling-off period on divorce outcomes shows that the cooling-off period increases filing cancellation and reduces finalized divorce rates without any effect on initial divorce filing rates. Estimates indicate that the number of divorces finalized decreases by approximately 9 percent, and that this effect is consistent over the long run. Research also shows that couples who have undergone a prior separation period or have conclusive causes to divorce do not respond to the cooling-off period, suggesting that emotional state at the time of decision is the driving force of observed dynamic inconsistency.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:femeco:v:21:y:2015:i:2:p:187-214
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Feminist Economics is currently edited by Diana Strassmann
More articles in Feminist Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().