The effect of anisotropic systematic errors in estimating helical angles
Fredrik Öhberg
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2008, vol. 11, issue 2, 205-213
Abstract:
A common question in movement studies is how the results should be interpreted with respect to systematic and random errors. In this study, simulations are made in order to see how a rigid body's orientation in space (i.e. helical angle between two orientations) is affected by (1) a systematic error added to a single marker (2) a combination of this systematic error and Gaussian white noise. The orientation was estimated after adding a systematic error to one marker within the rigid body. This procedure was repeated with Gaussian noise added to each marker.In conclusion, results show that the systematic error's effect on estimated orientation depends on number of markers in the rigid body and also on which direction the systematic error is added. The systematic error has no effect if the error is added along the radial axis (i.e. the line connecting centre of mass and the affected marker).
Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255840701722498 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:11:y:2008:i:2:p:205-213
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20
DOI: 10.1080/10255840701722498
Access Statistics for this article
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton
More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().